Fresno State
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
854  Cooper Gill JR 33:34
869  Matt Kwiatkowski JR 33:37
1,331  Efren Reyes SO 34:16
1,351  Joel Gonzalez SO 34:17
1,894  Clay Celum JR 35:10
1,983  Nathan Esparza JR 35:18
2,188  Uriel Cabanas JR 35:45
2,330  Robert Leija JR 36:08
National Rank #187 of 308
West Region Rank #26 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 5.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Cooper Gill Matt Kwiatkowski Efren Reyes Joel Gonzalez Clay Celum Nathan Esparza Uriel Cabanas Robert Leija
Stanford Invitational 09/26 1200 34:35 33:34 33:50 34:02 34:44 35:01 35:38 36:46
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational 10/17 1188 33:29 33:48 34:24 33:53 35:05 34:20 35:35
Mountain West Championships 10/30 1197 33:14 33:29 34:04 34:45 35:24 36:08 35:59
West Region Championships 11/13 1240 33:25 33:35 35:07 34:53 35:48 36:04





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.0 711 0.1 0.8 1.7 2.9 6.2 10.6 14.7 18.2 20.6 18.9 4.0 1.1 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cooper Gill 109.3
Matt Kwiatkowski 111.0
Efren Reyes 148.5
Joel Gonzalez 150.0
Clay Celum 185.1
Nathan Esparza 188.8
Uriel Cabanas 202.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.8% 0.8 18
19 1.7% 1.7 19
20 2.9% 2.9 20
21 6.2% 6.2 21
22 10.6% 10.6 22
23 14.7% 14.7 23
24 18.2% 18.2 24
25 20.6% 20.6 25
26 18.9% 18.9 26
27 4.0% 4.0 27
28 1.1% 1.1 28
29 0.2% 0.2 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0